Hawai'i Actors Network

Where dreams go to work!

"THE LEGAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RIGHTS PROTECTING PRIVACY AGAINST PUBLIC HARASSMENT."

"WHOM IS SHALT NOT BE EQUALLY PROTECTED UNDER LAWS BY US CONSTITUTION AS ENTITLED EVEN IF A CELEBRITY."

Pius Cerium Per Se'

"A Protection Of Personal Liberty."

a legal class action.

Article 8 US Constitution Liberty & Happiness Cannot Be Infringed that legally the only time a video; and or pictures taken may be used is by legal consent { IN FACT } unless it's criminally warranted; or such punitive damages or actual paid that in use such as audio and video surveillance tapes may not be used unless by approval of the court. That by law may be left to interpretation to remand it as evidence' that in such presented as probable cause only then is the right of the first of amendment people right to know; that it not a violation of personal liberty or privacy matters unless actual explicit consent was given. {MEDIA & PUBLIC FIGURE, such as a Athlete, Celebrity, or Political Members, etc.} Thus also meaning under laws and protections by legal enforcement. Exception to the Rule is only implied in place of film production by event location; as a matter of advertised.

"The Pursuit of Liberty Happiness and Freedom."

All Proper Procedure: as implied.

Thus also means collection of discarded mail / name / is still legally of inscribed as their own property - legal per se - must be obtained by matter of legal and proper procedure.

Simple Example:

Charlie Sheen + Paris Hilton + Lindsey Lohan, eg. etc all

end of sumary.

Written By,

Robert Lane Aiassa 02/22/2018

0 members like this

Comment

You need to be a member of Hawai'i Actors Network to add comments!

Join Hawai'i Actors Network

Comment by Robert Lane Aiassa on March 10, 2018 at 2:40pm: I wrote to help people, protecting their rights, [that required also such as due process required in any given amendments.] thus including freedom of speech [ as it's a choice to comment ' yes / or no ] in seeking equality of happiness in all matters of privacy ; are they or anyone also not to be protected under the constitution?

Your Welcome